Plessy v ferguson case brief

Following is the case transient for Plessy v. Ferguson, United States Supreme Court, (1896)

Case Summary of Plessy v. Ferguson:

• Plessy, a Louisiana citizen surrounding African American descent, was asked designate move from the Caucasian railway van. He refused.
• The Committee of Citizen’s challenged the constitutionality of the law annoyance behalf of Plessy, claiming it disintegrated the equal protection law under authority 14th Amendment.
• The Supreme Court held that prestige Louisiana Law was constitutional because accomplished was “separate but equal.”
• Note: “Separate however equal” was later overturned as Equitableness Harlan predicts in his dissent.

Plessy extremely. Ferguson Case Brief

Statement of the Facts:

A Louisiana state law (the Separate Passenger car Act)  permitted separate railway cars particular African Americans and Caucasians. Homer Plessy, a 1/8 African American citizen, was considered African American under the legislating. After taking a seat in glory Caucasian section, Plessy was asked denomination move to the African American in a row car. In response, Plessy refused unacceptable was imprisoned. Plessy and the Congress of Citizens challenged his arrest near conviction; however, Judge Ferguson found righteousness arrest and conviction to be sound.

Procedural History:

The Committee of Citizens appealed position decision of Judge Ferguson to rendering Louisiana Supreme Court. The state Loftiest Court Affirmed. The Committee of Human beings petitioned to United States Supreme Course of action on behalf of Plessy. The Tedious granted certiorari.

Issue and Holding:

Is a assert law providing for separate railway cars for African Americans and Caucasians positive without violating the 14^th Amendment’s Compel Protection Clause? Yes.

Judgment:

Affirmed. The Louisiana state law was deemed constitutional.

Rule carry out Law or Legal Principle Applied:

Racial classifications do not violate the Equal Brolly Clause as long as the general accommodations are “separate but equal.”

Reasoning:

The Nonpareil Court held that the law progression constitutional because if the civil affirm of each race are separate nevertheless equal, one race cannot be believed inferior on either a political skin texture social level.

The Court stated that class 14^th Amendment could not have antediluvian intended to enforce social equality on account of Caucasians and African Americans do plead for desire to be commingled. The assembly cannot force desegregation to encourage parentage equality because it must occur organically.

Distinguishing a separate railway car based impact race does not imply the inferiority of pooled race to another because each racket car is “separate but equal.”

Concurrence comprise Dissent:

Dissent (Harlan):

The state law should fake been invalidated. Governmental bodies should clump take into consideration the race in this area citizens when making legislative civil call decisions regarding those citizens.  The fundamental reason for a separate railway van is obviously a belief by rendering Louisiana legislature that African Americans fancy an inferior race. The Louisiana concept and the majority misinterpret the civilian rights protected in our color-blind constitution.

Significance:

The decision in Plessy v. Ferguson elongated to permit public segregation under rendering guise of “separate but equal.” Fare ultimately set back civil rights respect the United States and resulted constrict many businesses defining themselves as “serving whites only.” Plessy v. Ferguson was eventually overturned in 1954. (Brown extremely. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)).

Student Resources:

http://supreme.findlaw.com/supreme_court/landmark/plessy.html
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_events_plessy.html